Find out the latest indie author news. For FREE.

ADVERTISEMENT

Frederic Seager
Author
Neville Chamberlain's War
Neville Chamberlain's war was phoney from the start. He did not seek the defeat of Germany, since the British establishment viewed that country as the prime bulwark against Bolshevism. After more than eight months of waiting, during which time the French army and the small British contingent lost much of their fighting spirit, Hitler launched a remarkably successful invasion of Norway, the Low Countries and France. In effect, Britain handed most of Western democratic Europe to Nazi Germany on a silver platter. It was Hitler's finest hour.
Reviews
Seager (Jesus, the Man and the Myth) examines Neville Chamberlain’s role in the second World War, describing him as “the quintessential sleepwalker, leading his country and France into a war he neither wanted nor understood.” That sentiment sets the tone early on, as Seager decries Chamberlain’s general strategy of appeasement and uses the Phoney War as a reminder that “any state… must first understand what it will be fighting for and then carefully weigh its chances of victory before committing itself to violent action.” Seager acknowledges that Chamberlain desperately sought peace, yet failed to bring it about, restrain Hitler, or weaken Germany.

Seager begins by contextualizing pre-WWII British sentiment towards Germany, from viewing the treaty of Versailles as ineffective, to idealizing Germany as a potential bulwark against Bolshevism. He argues this led to early victories for Hitler and restrained Britain’s power, until the invasion of France changed the war to a fight for British survival. Seager’s narrative is captivating in large part because he doesn’t shy away from strong critiques of British and French leadership—including his assertion that Chamberlain (and Churchill, to some extent) advocated for a wait-and-see policy based on the false assumption that French troops would never fall to a German invasion.

Readers will clearly grasp the reasoning behind Chamberlain’s actions, even as Seager denounces many of his decisions—though the narrative hints that Britain’s options were limited, at best, to avoid war or constrain Germany, particularly after what Seager calls the “sinister farce” that took place at Munich. The overriding message to learn from the mistakes of the past—and carefully consider alternatives to war—is clear throughout. Seager includes an index and bibliography in the backmatter for clarification and further research, but readers will want to be familiar with the subtleties of World War II before jumping in.

Takeaway: A thought-provoking examination of Chamberlain’s role in World War II.

Comparable Titles: Adrian Phillips’s Fighting Churchill, Appeasing Hitler, Tim Bouverie’s Appeasement.

Production grades
Cover: B
Design and typography: N/A
Illustrations: N/A
Editing: A
Marketing copy: A

ADVERTISEMENT

Loading...