Haymaker capably brings to light the role technology plays in both aiding and complicating human lives, emphasizing the ethical implications behind AI development and the need to preserve a sense of human touch in technological systems. Devyn—a staunch advocate against AI reliance—discovers that Ergo could advance her progressive social agenda, creating an intense moral quandary that plays out in her use of the program to introduce legislation revamping social assistance funds, while her parishioner Darcie, struggling to make ends meet after her husband’s suicide, becomes a mouthpiece, of sorts, for Devyn’s work. Both women must come to terms with the promise—and potential drawbacks—of sentient AI, while the morally complex Venkat is compelled to redefine his commitment to social responsibility.

Haymaker makes a refreshing departure from AI-centric clichés, skillfully exploring the idea that technology holds immense potential—amid equally monumental ethical accountability. As Venkat remarks, “consciousness permits suffering, and from there, AI rights are inevitable,” an observation that brings to light implications for our own future. Corporate money plays an integral role throughout the narrative as well, as Haymaker spotlights the influence corporate funds can have on AI development (“Follow the money. That’s where you’ll find the species traitors peddling toxic digital products to their fellow humans” Devyn’s mentor warns her). This is a gripping snapshot of humanity’s future.

Takeaway: Gripping spotlight on the ethical implications of sentient AI.

Comparable Titles: Louisa Hall’s Speak, Annalee Newitz’s Autonomous.

Production grades
Cover: B+
Design and typography: A
Illustrations: N/A
Editing: A
Marketing copy: A